Industrialized Cyclist Notepad


Hamilton on the future of U.S. shale oil

Throwing a little cold water on some recent, loudly reported unscientific predictions. When you read Hamilton, always be sure to read the comments by Jeffrey Brown for an important Big Picture view.

In addition to the uncertainties noted above about extrapolating historical production rates, the rate at which production declines from a given well over time is another big unknown. Another key point to recognize is the added cost of extracting oil from tight formations. West Texas Intermediate is currently around $85/barrel. With the huge discount for Canadian and north-central U.S. producers, that means that producers of North Dakota sweet are only offered $61 a barrel. Tight oil is not going to be the reason that we return to an era of cheap oil, for the simple reason that if oil again fell below $50/barrel, it wouldn’t be profitable to produce with these methods. Nor is tight oil likely to get the U.S. back to the levels of field production that we saw in 1970. But tight oil will likely provide a source of significant new production over the next decade as long as the price does not fall too much.

via Econbrowser: Shale oil and tight oil.



Shale gas drilling

From a detailed article at Rigzone. http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=113890&hmpn=1



More confusion

Louise Basinese, Wall Street Daily. The confusion about refinery product exports is getting brutal.

http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2011/12/16/peak-oil/



Predicted future production from the Bakken shale
November 28, 2011, 02:17
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , ,

“A Second Look at Oil Production in the Bakken,” by Heading Out, The Oil Drum, Nov. 27, 2011

The black line on the bottom represents oil price.

Not surprisingly, the predictions are coming back to earth already.




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 80 other followers